SO(TU) Long, SO(TU) Well, Auf Wiedersehen, Good-bye
<< Previous post: Obama's South Carolina Smackdown Next post: The Farewell Performance >>01/28/08
SO(TU) Long, SO(TU) Well, Auf Wiedersehen, Good-bye

It's not about him anymore. He just doesn't know it yet.
For years, President Bush and his advisers expressed frustration that the White House received little credit for the nation's strong economic performance because of public discontent about the Iraq war. Today, the president is getting little credit for improved security in Iraq, as the public increasingly focuses on a struggling U.S. economy.
But the reason people never gave Bush much credit for the economy was that for most people the economy was never that awesome. While Iraq is something that most people don't experience directly, the economy is. And if they aren't completely thrilled about it, there's probably a reason.
Back to the Post:
That is the problem Bush faces as he prepares to deliver his seventh and probably final State of the Union address tonight. For the first time in four years, he will come before Congress able to report some progress in tamping down violence in Iraq. Yet the public appears to have moved on from the war -- and possibly from Bush himself.
To follow up on Dr. Atrios' point, as the economy for most people was never as great as the administration said it was, the "improved security in Iraq" may not be the festival of ponies they're advertising it as either.
And did Mr. Abramowitz read his own article? The public "appears" to have "possibly" moved on from Bush? A mere 6 paragraphs later, he answers his own question, citing Bush's low low low approval rating, 32%. Yeah, I'd say they're over him. And if you wanted to know why, Mr. Abramowitz provides the answer in paragraph #5:
White House officials and their allies argue that the turmoil in the nation's housing and financial markets provides Bush a new opportunity to lead...
No. Stop right there. Watching the fire spread from the fireplace to the rug to the curtains until the whole house is ablaze AND THEN offering to get a bucket of water is NOT leadership. The time to lead would've been BEFORE the mortgage crisis exploded, BEFORE the economy needed a stmulating package. That opportunity has long passed.
But that won't stop the president this evening from taking to the airwaves and offering to close the barn door, sans cheval.
A president's final State of the Union address is generally seen as the official starting point for lame duck status, so expectations are even lower than usual. But Larry Kudlow, blogging at the Corner, urges President Bush to chin up, Buckaroo:
While all is never perfect, you have delivered on the most fundamental hopes for the nation: peace and prosperity. America’s greatness is grounded on optimism and freedom. You have spoken loudly in support of these great themes. You have succeeded to a far-greater degree than the intellectual elites will ever admit. Stay the course, Mr. President. Stay optimistic.
Puh-wha? Peace? We're at war in two countries right now, and Bush is hankering for a third. Prosperity? Mortgage Crisis! Optimism and Freedom? We practice torture and spy on our own citizens! I'm not sure what country Mr. Kudlow is talking about. Perhaps it's the one inside the president's bubble:
Bush is likely going to praise the bipartisan stimulus deal as a cure-all while continuing to tell us that America has been doing exactly the right thing for the past seven years--fighting the terrorists over there so we don't have to fight them here. No bad decisions were ever made, no recession is occurring, no heads need roll.
That's to be expected from this dead-ender president.
We will see tonight the usual predictable moments. The state of our union will be called strong. New Orleans and Katrina will be mentioned only in passing if at all. Democrats will be attacked for ______, ______ and ______, followed by a plea that they should all "work together". At least one truly nutty, he-said-what? proposal will be floated, i.e. Mars. And of course, the special guest stars:
Chances are he'll have some white guy from a red state who started a business in 2007 and hired two black guys sitting next to Laura Bush, right there in the seat Ahmad Chalabi used to occupy. He'll point to that guy, who created two whole jobs, as emblematic of the success of endless tax cuts for giant corporations like Countrywide. Maybe he'll even bring back that "uniquely American" woman with the disabled son who works three jobs -- assuming she can get the time off.
Tonight's speech will have it all: the disconnect, the petulance, the duplicity. The mangled syntax. But one thing it won't have? A reason for anyone to watch:
Tune in tonight to Bush's final State of the Union address to hear what a president with an overall 32% approval rating, and only 30% on Iraq and 28% on the economy, has to say about issues no one with a functioning brain trusts him to competently address.
Yeah, but some of us will watch anyway, if for no other reason than it's the last time we'll have to watch him do this.
Trackback address for this post:
http://rnnblogs.com/htsrv/trackback.php/821