Supreme Court Pick: Should Kagan Be Confirmed?

June 29th, 2010   (211 views )

Elena Kagan is rejecting claims by Republicans that when she was the dean of Harvard Law School, she set out to thwart the efforts of military recruiters. She says they had access
to Harvard Law students "every single day." But Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions responded that her comments were "unconnected to reality." The exchange came as the Supreme Court nominee faces questions from senators at her confirmation hearing.
We ask: Supreme Court Pick: Should Kagan Be Confirmed?

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: George [Visitor]
kagan should be appointed to the supreme court. She will bring balance to ths court that is sorely missing at the present time. Look at their recent rulings on citizen united and on handguns. Roberts & Alito were appointed last year and both favor corporations over the individual rights. Sen Sessons spend 1/2 hour on the same subject and did not question her on what she would do on future issued that would come up on future courts. The republicans will go to any length to discredit a nominee.
PermalinkPermalink 06/29/10 @ 15:13
Comment from: Caspian [Visitor] Email
Sen Sessons spend 1/2 hour on the same subject and did not question her on what she would do on future issued that would come up on future courts.

-----------------------

George a nominee cannot discuss future court cases.

PermalinkPermalink 06/29/10 @ 15:58
Justice Integrity Project Urges 'No" Vote on Kagan

Washington, DC (June 28, 2010)—The Senate should reject Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination because she seeks to expand executive branch authority at the expense of the public’s historic civil rights.

PermalinkPermalink 06/29/10 @ 17:00
Comment from: Big Bob [Visitor] · http://powerlineblog.com/
A Smoking Gun in the Kagan Case?

Unless there is some other interpretation of these documents that does not occur to me, it appears that Elena Kagan participated in a gigantic scientific deception. On behalf of the Clinton White House, she deliberately subverted what was supposed to be an objective scientific process. The ACOG report was certainly seen in that light by the federal courts. Federal Judge Richard Kopf was deeply impressed by the scientific integrity of the report;

Isn't that what Obama did with the No Deep Drilling Moratorium? Don't like the facts, just change it to your liking then re-submit.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 01:06
Kagan's kabuki theater

Ms. Kagan is playing her expected role in the predictable manner. We saw the same kabuki dance during the hearings for Justice Sonia Sotomayor less than a year ago. When asked by the sympathetic Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat, if she agreed that "the Supreme Court decided in Heller that the personal right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution against federal law restrictions," Ms. Sotomayor answered: "It is." Yet her answer to this obviously staged question was a lie. On Monday, Justice Sotomayor joined the Supreme Court minority in saying that there is "nothing in the Second Amendment's text, history or underlying rationale that could warrant characterizing it as 'fundamental,' insofar as it seeks to protect the keeping and bearing of arms for private self-defense purposes." In other words, she was untruthful.

Liberals are such liars.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 02:03
Comment from: Gunther [Visitor] Email
What the eff are you talking about big bob? Wasn't sotomayor a bush apointee? and liberals are liars? mr. pot meet mr. kettle....
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 11:36
Comment from: Gail [Visitor] Email
OPEN THREAD: DENTISTS, WHETHER YOU HAVE INSURANCE OR NOT.

A Woodstock, New York, a dentist charges, AFTER INSURANCE, etc., $600 ("SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS") to the patient for a PLASTIC, TEMPORARY, CAP!

ASPEN DENTAL has a free initial exam with free xrays, WHICH ASPEN SAYS YOU NEED EVERY 6 MONTHS, BUT, CHARGES $130 ("ONE HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS") FOR SO-CALLED CLEANING ITEMS, SUCH AS AN ORDINARY TOOTHBRUCH, WHICH ARE FORCED ON THE BILL AND ON THE PATIENT.

Both dentists, have beautiful advertising in newspapers and tv.

Are there any dental clinics in NYC?
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 12:05
Comment from: robert [Visitor] Email
Should Jeff Sessions be a supreme court justice?He got his shot and was brought down,so now he is just bitter to any opposition party nominee.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 14:08
Comment from: robert [Visitor] Email
Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) is the new point man for the Republican Party in terms of the confirmation hearings for the eventual nominee to replace Justice David Souter. Senator Sessions has a troubled past where civil rights is concerned and personally, he leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. He was named the ranking Republican member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which was left vacant last week after Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) switched parties. Sessions will walk a very fine line when he takes center stage to challenge President Obama's choice for the court. It's ironic that Sessions' own 1986 nomination to the federal courts turned into a racially tinged firestorm.

http://blackpoliticalthought.blogspot.com/2009/05/senator-jeff-sessions-who-has-shady.html
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 14:13
Comment from: robert [Visitor] Email
RE:Sessions, that was a nomination for a federal court position,not supreme court.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 14:18
Comment from: Gail [Visitor] Email
HEADLINES: DIVIDED LEGISLATURE UNLIKELY TO OVERRIDE PATERSON'S VETOES--LEGISLATURES GET $1.2 MILLION FOR EXPENSES

The legislatures had $4 million in salary withheld until they vote on the 2010-11 budget, BUT HAVE STILL RECEIVED $1.2 MILLION SINCE APRIL 1 FOR THEIR DAILY EXPENSES TO COME TO ALBANY..


Unless you are on welfare, do you receive daily expenses? Doesn't it come from your base salary?


The legislatures receive $171--A DAY--WHEN THEY ARE IN TOWN (Albany) FOR LODGING AND MEALS. The per diem covers hotel, meal and travel expenses!

DO YOU GET PAID FOR YOUR LODGING, WHEREEVER YOU SLEEP, YOUR MEALS, WHEREEVER YOU EAT, AND THE TRAVEL EXPENSES, EVEN IF IT IS AROUND TOWN?

Saland received $4,470 in per diems for the past 3 ("three") months--living large on the taxpayer, many who do not work for that much.

THE STATE BUDGET HAS BEEN LATE 23 OF THE PAST 25 YEARS. AND , THEIR BASE SALARY IS WITHHELD AND THEY LIVE ON THE PER DIEMS UNTIL THE BUDGET IS PASSED WHEN THEY RECEIVE THEIR BACK PAY.

Albany legislatures receive a base salary of $79,500, PLUS STIPENDS FOR CHAIRING COMMITTEEES AND OTHER POSITIONS.

WHAT DO THEY GET PAID $79,500 FOR?


And, might as well as, the judge who now gets paid for dry cleaning his robes on the taxpayer--$10,000 a year.

PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 14:32
Comment from: Gail [Visitor] Email
Kagan has known Obama for years and is part of Obama's clique and political philosophy.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 14:36
Comment from: Gail [Visitor] Email
p.S. There is no incentive for a legislature representative to excel, except MONEY--FOR CHAIRING COMMITTEES, OTHERWISE THEY CAN RIDE FOR FREE.

WHAT WAS THE REPRESENTATIVE ELECTED FOR? THE PEOPLE'S VOTE SHOULD BE THE INCENTIVE TO CHAIR COMMITTEE'S AND POSITIONS, NOT MONEY.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 14:41
Comment from: John [Visitor] Email
No. Definately not. Her views are too political and she has no judicial experience. This will only hurt the American court system in the long run.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 17:24
Comment from: Linda [Visitor] Email
She is the best nominee out there. Of course she should be confirmed. Kagan will finally bring balance to the court which is pretty much unbalanced and bias after Alito and Roberts were appointed last year. Its obvious they favor corporations over individual rights.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 17:28
Comment from: Mike G [Visitor] Email
I don't know much about her views, I can only judge by one thing. If Obama, who seems to care little about us, wants her confirmed, then she should not be confirmed, because it probably means it is not in the best interest of the people,
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 17:53
Comment from: robert [Visitor] Email
FYI:

EXPLODING THE MYTHS ABOUT MONEY

Our money system is not what we have been led to believe. The creation of money has been "privatized," or taken over by private money lenders. Thomas Jefferson called them “bold and bankrupt adventurers just pretending to have money.” Except for coins, all of our money is now created as loans advanced by private banking institutions — including the privately-owned Federal Reserve. Banks create the principal but not the interest to service their loans. To find the interest, new loans must continually be taken out, expanding the money supply, inflating prices — and robbing you of the value of your money.

http://www.webofdebt.com/
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 20:19
Comment from: Bill F. [Visitor] Email · http://www.debka.com/article/8877/
Panetta: Iran can build two nukes within two years - sanctions unavailing

June 27, 2010

CIA director Leon Panetta has admitted that Iran has enough low-enriched uranium for two nuclear bombs that would likely take two years to build. In an interview with ABC's This Week Sunday, June 27, the spy chief virtually admitted that every effort to halt Iran's drive for a nuclear bomb had failed. Asked if the latest round of UN sanctions would put an end to Iran's nuclear ambitions, he said: "Probably not."
According to debkafile's military sources, Panetta was the most realistic of any US official of late about the epic turn of events confronting the US, Israel, the Middle East and the Gulf nations, namely Iran's transformation into the region's second nuclear power after Israel.
His evaluation translates into the following prognosis: If today Iran has enough low-enriched uranium to build its first two nuclear warheads two years hence, it means that by then, by sustaining its present rate of progress, Tehran will have acquired enough fissile fuel to build another five to six bombs and another 10-12 by 2015. A nuclear arsenal was Iran's goal from the year 2000 and it is steadily advancing on this goal unhindered by any outside security interference, as debkafile's military and Iranian sources have reported for the last six months.
At the beginning of June, Israeli Mossad director Meir Dagan estimated that Iran was lagging behind its enriched uranium target due to a number of technical malfunctions. But he never said or even implied that the program was stalled. That it was not, Panetta has now confirmed.

In so doing, he refuted the latest firm-sounding assertions by US president Barack Obama and defense secretary Robert Gates that Iran will not be allowed to acquire nuclear arms.
Although he did not spell this out, the CIA director's words mean that since diplomacy and sanctions have reached a dead end, the only realistic option left for bring Iran's nuclear progress to a halt is a military strike. But in the same interview, asked about a potential Israeli military attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, Panetta said he thinks "Israel is giving the US room on the diplomatic and political fronts."

What he said, in effect, was that the Netanyahu-Barak government, which rarely moves in any direction without President Obama's okay, is still not considering military action against Iran - even at this eleventh hour before disaster - and willing to go along with the Obama administration's pretense that the diplomatic option can still work.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and defense minister Ehud Barak are sidestepping the toughest security threats Israel ha faced - a nuclear-armed Iran and the evolving extremist, anti-West "Northern Islamic alliance" in the process of formation by Iran, Turkey, Syria, Hamas and Hizballah. They are immersed instead in such side issues as calibrating the sustainability of the Gaza siege, the fictitious indirect talks with the Palestinians (Mahmoud Abbas is never in the country) and a possible handover to Lebanon of the tiny divided village of Ghajar, which no one wants other than the UN peacekeeping force.
Israel's leaders continue to hide from the public the fundamental differences between Israel and the Obama administration not just about Iran, but about its own nuclear capabilities in the face of the US president's determination to denuclearize the Middle East, starting with international restrictions and inspections for Israel's reputed arsenal.
The Netanyahu government's willingness to align its policies with Washington accounts for the constant flow of senior US military and defense officials visiting Israel and proclaiming the administration's dedication to Israel's security. Only last week, Michele Flournoy, US undersecretary of defense for policy, attended a session in Tel Aviv of the annual strategic dialogue between the two governments. She pledged that the US would always guarantee Israel's military and technological supremacy.

Last week too Barak was in Washington and held talks with Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of staff. Only 72 hours later, Mullen paid a short visit to Tel Aviv and was again closeted with Barak after meeting chief of staff Maj. Gen. Gaby Ashkenazi and the IDF's high command.
When his turn for a statement came round, he said he tried to see regional events through Israeli eyes.
All these visits and talks are extremely important. But what use are they when their only purpose is to hold Israel back from using its military superiority to defend itself against Iran, a vital need which should be obvious to anyone seeing the Middle East through Israeli eyes?

The brakes Washington applies to Israel's freedom of action in its own defense have allowed Iran to reach the advanced stage in its nuclear objectives frankly described by Leon Panetta on June 27.
PermalinkPermalink 06/30/10 @ 21:23
You gave fantastic honest ideas here. I performed a research on the issue and discovered almost all peoples will agree with your blog. I once worked for a bank about two years ago, and I left because it made me feel bad the kind of practices I went along with working for them.
PermalinkPermalink 10/25/10 @ 07:24
Comment from: Rozanne Baik [Visitor] · http://weightlossdavem.livejournal.com/
Hi there, I found your blog on Google while seeking for first aid for a heart attack and your post looks very interesting for me. Through the miracle of compound interest your money will grow over time and give you the tools you need to become wealthy.
PermalinkPermalink 10/30/10 @ 03:53
Comment from: Payday Loans Online [Visitor] · http://thepaydayloansonlinehq.com/
Awesome post
PermalinkPermalink 11/04/10 @ 10:30
Comment from: Tony Rothschild [Visitor] · http://forum.joomlaworks.gr/profile/jamessylar33/?sa=summary
This is a really good read for me. Must admit that you are one of the coolest bloggers I ever saw. Thanks for posting this useful article. If it is in a highly traveled area, lots of people are going to be exposed to your vacant apartment.
PermalinkPermalink 11/04/10 @ 15:47
Comment from: Hisako Frolich [Visitor] · http://layoversecurity.com/index.php?action=profile;u=12932
Hello, I was researching the net and I ran into your blog. Keep up the great work.
PermalinkPermalink 11/05/10 @ 10:36
I have been looking for content like this for a research project I am working. Thanks very much. They are going to love that everything matches.
PermalinkPermalink 11/06/10 @ 11:53
Comment from: Abigail Defrancisco [Visitor] · http://blackbassreviews.com/index.php?action=profile;u=50441
The 'Extreme Weight loss Level' This figure is 40 less than the maintenance level Proper planning of the foods eaten is also a great tip on instant weight loss.
PermalinkPermalink 11/07/10 @ 11:31
As a fitness center owner, one way you can do this is to advance qualified staff to mid level management positions. Hormones 101. What You Really Need to Know About Natural Hormone Health by Dr.
PermalinkPermalink 11/08/10 @ 02:25
Comment from: Danette Doxie [Visitor] · http://scriptmafia.pl/member.php?u=36709
This is often a very smart browse on behalf of me, Should admit that you are one in every of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.
PermalinkPermalink 11/09/10 @ 12:05
Comment from: Osvaldo Knepel [Visitor] · http://www.googit.net/Steadrouc
You have some honest ideas here. I done a research on the issue and discovered most peoples will agree with your blog.
PermalinkPermalink 11/10/10 @ 17:19
Comment from: Jacinto Esslinger [Visitor] · http://www.funasdalen.nu/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=66763
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Thanks! Baby feeding Schedule
PermalinkPermalink 11/11/10 @ 06:10
There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Enter, one of the best home printer solutions around, the Dell Wasabi PZ310 ultraportable printer, with an ultra-affordable price tag of $100.
PermalinkPermalink 11/12/10 @ 11:35
hi buddy, I found your site from wikipedia and read a few of your other blog posts.They are cool. Pls continue this great work. You know that new babies have to go home from the hospital in a safe, properly installed car seat.
PermalinkPermalink 11/12/10 @ 23:31
You had some good ideas there. I made a search on the issue and noticed most peoples will agree with your blog. The space between your wooden floorboards, or in among your carpeting, or in bed frames are good places to start.
PermalinkPermalink 11/13/10 @ 14:06
Comment from: Henry Lastinger [Visitor] · http://ilrp.herobo.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10038
You raise a lot of questions in my head; you wrote a good post, but this post is also thought provoking, and I will have to ponder it some more; I will be back soon.
PermalinkPermalink 11/14/10 @ 00:09
You got numerous positive points there. I made a search on the issue and found nearly all peoples will agree with your blog. The simple way to avoid most of their unfair practices they argue, is to simply live within your means.
PermalinkPermalink 11/14/10 @ 11:10
Comment from: buy resveratrol [Visitor] · http://buyresveratrolonline.org/
Isn't the initial commenter telling the real truth or what??
PermalinkPermalink 11/14/10 @ 12:54
Comment from: golf club reviews [Visitor] · http://golfclubreviewssite.com/
Great post
PermalinkPermalink 11/14/10 @ 19:14
Comment from: Jules Fraleigh [Visitor] · http://www.schoolus.org/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=14585
Thank you very much for that great article Rodney Allen Rippy was just such a child star.
PermalinkPermalink 11/15/10 @ 00:45
nice post
PermalinkPermalink 11/15/10 @ 18:03
great article
PermalinkPermalink 11/17/10 @ 13:58
Comment from: Loren Marcellus [Visitor] · http://kikilisalda.comlu.com/index.php?action=profile;u=32067
There's a wealth of information here. Thanks! I’ll be back for more. It was either Burger King or Beefaroni, not sure which, but he definitely hit the big time.
PermalinkPermalink 11/19/10 @ 06:38
Comment from: Wilmer Figueroa [Visitor] · http://www.ufopulse.com/community/index.php?action=profile;u=28257
Advantageously, the post is actually the greatest topic on curing acne naturally. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your future updates. Just saying thanks will not just be enough, for the wonderful clarity in your writing. I will instantly grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. As simple as it may sound, if you can’t remove yourself from the situation – count to ten.
PermalinkPermalink 11/29/10 @ 07:31

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Previous post: Gun Ban Reversal: Will the Public Be More of Less Safe?Next post: Should Washington Cut State Funding in Tough Economic Times?