WASHINGTON (AP) - The shooting rampage in Arizona seems to have
created a reset moment for confrontational politics, as lawmakers
reflect on the repercussions of the overheated rhetoric traded on
the airwaves and on the campaign trail.
Members of Congress from both parties called Sunday for civility
over belligerence as the House temporarily shelved the contentious
debate over repealing the health care law and lawmakers paused to
contemplate the tragedy.
Critically wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, the apparent target
of a lone shooter, emerged as a potent and cautionary symbol of the
current political climate. Still, there was no clear motivation for
the attack, and some warned against making provocative politicians
and commentators the culprits in the assault.
Six died and 14 were wounded in the shooting at a Tucson
shopping center where Giffords was holding a gathering with
constituents.
Authorities said the attack was the work of a single gunman.
They described the apprehended suspect, 22-year-old Jared Loughner,
as mentally unstable.
President Barack Obama will lead the nation in a moment of
silence at 11 a.m. Monday. He has postponed a scheduled trip
Tuesday to Schenectady, N.Y., where he planned to promote his
economic policies. "It will be a time for us to come together as a
nation in prayer or reflection, keeping the victims and their
families closely at heart," he said.
The Supreme Court said it plans to convene 10 minutes early on
Monday, at 9:50 a.m., so the justices can observe the moment of
silence at 11 a.m.
House Speaker John Boehner told lawmakers in a conference call
Sunday to "pull together as an institution."
"What is critical is that we stand together at this dark time
as one body," he said. "We need to rally around our wounded
colleague, the families of the fallen, and the people of Arizona's
8th District. And, frankly, we need to rally around each other."
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi canceled a scheduled
appearance Monday at the Detroit auto show.
Such unifying pauses are usual after national tragedies. The
Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack was a coalescing moment in the
nation that for a time improved the tone of Capitol Hill debate.
Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy
Center at the University of Pennsylvania and an expert on political
rhetoric, said there were similar breaks after the assassinations
of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr.
"There was a lot of discussion about the meaning of the moment
and what rhetoric had done to incite it," she said.
What's more, the attack on Giffords has given members of
Congress a sense of unusual common purpose. Leaders from both
parties worked together Sunday to offer members assurances that
they were reviewing security measures.
Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., the chairman of the House Democratic
Caucus, said his colleagues hope for "greater comity within the
House and the discourse that takes place all across this country."
Still, politics is a quarrelsome business and those breaks are
short-lived. In the 1990s politicians lamented "the politics of
personal destruction." President George W. Bush was the subject of
vicious criticism from the left, and President Obama has come under
stinging, personal attack from some of his critics.
Congress has also become more partisan, with a dwindling number
of moderate lawmakers. Veteran members of Congress have lamented a
changed culture where legislators spend little time socializing
with each other, a development that contributes to fewer
cross-party relationships.
While Sunday's calls for unity and civility were bipartisan, the
discussion had a partisan subtext as Democrats pointed to
anti-government language from the tea party movement and to
rabble-rousing imagery and rhetoric from conservative figures such
as Sarah Palin.
Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democratic leader in the
Senate, on Sunday mentioned Palin's combative rallying cry, "Don't
retreat; reload," and the crosshairs she used to signal
congressional districts where she wanted Republicans to win.
"These sorts of things, I think, invite the kind of toxic
rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an
acceptable response," Durbin said Sunday on CNN.
Republicans were especially sensitive to suggestions that their
side of the political spectrum was contributing to a more poisonous
political environment.
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., noted Sunday that the suspect in
the Tucson rampage was connected to Internet postings that included
Marxist and Nazi literature.
"That's not the profile of a typical tea party member, if
that's the inference that's being made," he said on CNN.
To be sure, combative language in politics is not the province
of a single party. It was Obama who declared during the 2008
presidential campaign, "If they bring a knife to the fight, we
bring a gun." And Sen. Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, ran
ads during last year's campaign that portrayed him with a
high-powered rifle, placing a cap-and-trade energy bill in the
crosshairs and blasting it to pieces.
The Tucson shooting could also result in hypersensitivity, where
lawmakers take any partisan comment as an invitation to incite a
fight.
"The danger in this is that people misread it and so the first
time that someone makes a statement that is partisan, it's
condemned as inappropriate," Jamieson said.
Experts say angry political language is made all the more
prevalent by the Internet and opinion-driven cable television,
amplifying the sense of confrontation. Jamieson says she doesn't
believe current Congresses have been more uncivil than past one.
"But the media culture has given us access to incivility that
probably was there all along but didn't have that much
accessibility," Jamieson said. "The consequence of broader
exposure is that it becomes normalized."
Previous post: New Congress's Focus: Ideology or Getting Things Done?Next post: Are You Buying What Gov. Christie is Selling?